Women and the Environment: Why Gender Equality Is a Climate Solution

Today, on International Women's Day, the Green World blog wants to celebrate a truth that the mainstream environmental movement has been too slow to acknowledge: women are not just victims of environmental degradation — they are the most powerful environmental stewards on Earth. From the forests of Kenya to the rivers of India, from the fields of Bangladesh to the fishing villages of Tamil Nadu, women are the frontline defenders of the natural world, and empowering them is one of the most effective climate solutions available to humanity. 

The connection between women and the natural environment runs deep and is not merely metaphorical. In rural communities across the developing world, women are the primary users and managers of natural resources at the household level. They collect water — often walking several kilometres to and from wells or rivers. They gather firewood for cooking and heating. They tend kitchen gardens that supplement family nutrition and income. They manage household waste. They make the daily decisions that determine how much water, energy, and food a household consumes. 

This intimate, practical relationship with natural resources gives women both a profound stake in environmental health and a wealth of ecological knowledge that formal science is only beginning to document. Indigenous and rural women have accumulated detailed knowledge of local plant species, seasonal patterns, water sources, and land management practices over generations. This knowledge is irreplaceable — and it is at risk of being lost as traditional practices are eroded by urbanization and cultural change. 

When the environment degrades — when wells dry up, forests disappear, soils fail, and fish populations collapse — it is women who bear the first and heaviest burden. As water sources move farther away, it is women and girls who walk farther to fetch water. As fuelwood becomes scarce, women spend more time gathering it and more time cooking over smoky, inefficient fires that damage their health. As crop yields fall due to climate change and soil degradation, it is often women — who do most of the farming in rural India and across the developing world — who must work harder for less return. 

The Chipko movement of the 1970s is the most celebrated example of women's environmental leadership in India, but it is far from unique. Women in Uttarakhand's villages locked arms around trees to prevent commercial loggers from felling them, understanding intuitively that the forests were the source of the water, fuel, and fodder their families depended on. The movement gave birth to India's modern environmental consciousness and inspired conservation movements around the world. 

Research consistently demonstrates that when women have secure land rights, access to credit and technology, and participation in environmental governance, the results are better outcomes for forests, water bodies, and biodiversity. Community forest management groups with significant female participation in Nepal, Malawi, and India consistently achieve better conservation outcomes than male-dominated groups. Women-led water management committees in rural Rajasthan have restored springs, revived degraded watersheds, and improved water security for entire villages. 

Climate change and gender inequality are also deeply intertwined. Climate change makes the work that women do — growing food, managing water, caring for families — harder and less certain. And women, because they have less access to information, early warning systems, financial resources, and mobility, are more vulnerable to climate disasters. The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami killed disproportionately more women than men; so did the 2019 and 2020 cyclones in Odisha. 

Empowering women — through education, economic opportunity, land rights, participation in governance, and access to technology — is therefore one of the highest-leverage investments a society can make in its environmental future. Project Drawdown, which has ranked climate solutions by their potential impact, identifies education for girls and women's empowerment as among the top climate solutions globally. On this International Women's Day, let us commit to recognizing, supporting, and amplifying women's environmental leadership at every level, from the village to the global summit.

Content Courtesy: Inspired by IUCN and UN Women reports

Climate Refugees: The Human Face of the Climate Crisis

In 2023, extreme weather events displaced approximately 26 million people from their homes — more than conflict and violence combined for the first time in recorded history. These are the world's climate refugees: people forced to flee not by war or political persecution, but by rising seas, more intense cyclones, prolonged droughts, catastrophic floods, and the slow, grinding degradation of the land and water resources they depend on for survival. 

The word 'refugee' still does not officially apply to people displaced by climate change under international law. The 1951 Refugee Convention protects people fleeing political persecution, but offers no legal protection to those fleeing climate-induced disasters. This legal gap leaves climate-displaced people in a precarious position, unable to access the protection, support, and resettlement options available to recognized refugees. Closing this gap is one of the most urgent human rights challenges of our time. 

The stories of climate displacement are heartbreaking in their specificity. In the Sundarbans of West Bengal, families who have lived on the same islands for generations are watching their land sink beneath the rising Bay of Bengal, metre by metre, year by year. In coastal Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, fisher communities are being forced inland by the increasing frequency and intensity of cyclones. In Rajasthan and Bundelkhand, prolonged droughts are emptying entire villages as farmers who can no longer grow crops or find water migrate to already overcrowded cities. 

Bangladesh is often cited as ground zero for climate displacement. The country is one of the most densely populated and climate-vulnerable nations on Earth. Rising sea levels, increasing salinity in coastal farmland, intensifying cyclones, and Brahmaputra River flooding are already displacing hundreds of thousands of Bangladeshis every year, many of whom migrate to Dhaka or attempt to cross into India. The scale of future displacement, absent dramatic global climate action, is almost incomprehensible. 

Sub-Saharan Africa presents another dimension of the crisis. In the Sahel region, a decades-long desertification trend driven by climate change, overgrazing, and deforestation is shrinking the area of productive farmland and pastoral land available to tens of millions of people. Competition over water and grazing rights is fuelling conflict. Young men with no economic future in their home communities are moving to cities or attempting the desperate journey across the Mediterranean to Europe — not primarily because of war, but because their land can no longer support them. 

The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre projects that without ambitious climate action, climate change could force over 1 billion people to migrate by 2050. To put this in perspective, the entire human population of the Earth was 1 billion in the year 1800. We could see, in a single century, a forced displacement of people larger than the entire world population of two hundred years ago. The humanitarian system, already stretched to breaking point, simply cannot absorb this scale of displacement. 

India is both a major contributor to climate change through its historical and current emissions, and one of the countries most vulnerable to its impacts. The Indian government has committed to ambitious climate targets, and India's renewable energy transition is genuinely impressive. But ambition must translate into action at the speed and scale that the science demands — not just for India's own sake, but out of solidarity with the most vulnerable communities within India and around the world. 

The climate crisis is fundamentally a justice issue. The people being displaced by climate change today — in Bangladesh's deltas, India's coastlines, Africa's drylands — are overwhelmingly the people who have contributed least to the greenhouse gas emissions that are causing it. They deserve not just our sympathy but concrete action: aggressive emission cuts, robust adaptation funding, and a legal framework that recognizes and protects climate refugees. Climate justice is not a slogan. It is an obligation.

Content Courtesy: Inspired by UNHCR and Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre

Wetlands: Earth's Most Undervalued Superheroes Are Disappearing

If you were to design the perfect ecosystem — one that cleaned water, prevented floods, stored carbon, supported extraordinary biodiversity, regulated rainfall, provided food and livelihoods to millions of people, and protected coastlines from storms and sea level rise — you would design a wetland. These remarkable ecosystems, often dismissed as muddy wastelands or breeding grounds for mosquitoes, are in fact among the most valuable and productive habitats on the planet. 

Wetlands — a broad category that includes marshes, swamps, bogs, peatlands, floodplains, estuaries, mangroves, coral reefs, and shallow coastal waters — cover only about 6% of Earth's land surface. Yet they support nearly 40% of all the world's known species. They are extraordinarily rich in life: a single hectare of wetland may contain more species of insects than an entire square kilometre of farmland. 

India is blessed with exceptional wetland wealth. The country has over 750,000 wetlands covering nearly 4.7% of its geographical area. These range from the magnificent Chilika Lake in Odisha — Asia's largest coastal lagoon and a globally important bird wintering ground — to the Wular Lake in Jammu and Kashmir, the Keoladeo National Park in Rajasthan, the flamingo habitats of the Rann of Kutch, and the mangrove forests of the Sundarbans. India has 75 Ramsar sites — wetlands recognized under the international Ramsar Convention as being of global importance. 

The ecosystem services that wetlands provide to humanity are staggering in their value. Wetlands act as natural water purifiers, filtering out pollutants, sediments, and pathogens as water flows through them. They act as giant sponges, absorbing excess rainfall and slowly releasing it, reducing both the severity of floods and the severity of droughts. In a single monsoon season, a large wetland can absorb billions of litres of water that would otherwise flood fields, roads, and homes. 

Wetlands store enormous amounts of carbon — particularly peat bogs, which have been accumulating organic material for thousands of years. When wetlands are drained or degraded, this stored carbon is released into the atmosphere as CO2 and methane, significantly worsening climate change. Protecting intact wetlands is therefore one of the most cost-effective climate solutions available — no technology required, just the wisdom to leave them alone. 

Wetlands are also among the most important fisheries in the world. Approximately two-thirds of all commercially important marine fish species spend part of their life cycle in coastal wetlands, using mangroves and estuaries as nurseries for their young. The livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people — particularly coastal fishing communities in India — depend directly on healthy, productive wetlands. 

Yet we are destroying wetlands at three times the rate at which we are losing forests. Since 1970, the world has lost approximately 35% of its wetlands. In India, rapid urbanization is swallowing coastal and inland wetlands. Agricultural drainage converts marshes and floodplains into farmland. Industrial effluents and sewage pollute and degrade wetland ecosystems. Invasive aquatic plants like water hyacinth choke thousands of water bodies. And climate change is altering the hydrology of wetlands across the country.

The loss of wetlands is not inevitable. Communities across India are demonstrating that with the right support and policies, wetlands can be restored and protected. The revival of traditional community pond management systems, the restoration of degraded mangroves, and the removal of invasive species are all yielding results. World Wetlands Day on February 2 each year is an opportunity to remember what we stand to lose — and to renew our commitment to protecting Earth's blue-green heart. 

India has a powerful opportunity to demonstrate global wetland leadership. The country's 75 Ramsar sites, its vibrant community conservation tradition, and its ancient cultural reverence for water bodies provide a strong foundation. What is needed is sustained political commitment, adequate funding for wetland monitoring and restoration, and a shift in public consciousness that sees wetlands not as wastelands but as the irreplaceable natural infrastructure they truly are. A nation that protects its wetlands protects its water, its food, its coasts, its climate, and its extraordinary natural heritage.

Content Courtesy: Inspired by Ramsar Convention and WWF India

Our Rivers Are Dying

Ganga, Krishna, Narmada, Kaveri – many of our great rivers are depleting fast. If we do not act now, the legacy we hand over to the next generation will be one of conflict and deprivation. These rivers nurtured and nourished us for thousands of years. It is time we nurture and nourish them back to health.

Saving Our Rivers

The simplest solution to rejuvenate India’s rivers is to maintain a minimum of one kilometer tree cover on riversides.

Forest trees can be planted on government land and tree-based agriculture brought in on farm land. This will ensure our rivers are fed throughout the year by the moist soil. This will also reduce floods, drought and soil loss, and increase farmers’ incomes. Learn More

What you can do…

Your missed call will help in the creation of a positive river policy to revive our rivers. Find out how

Send Us Your Ideas

We welcome all environmental scientists, experts and practitioners to contribute their knowledge and expertise towards creating a roadmap to rejuvenate our depleting rivers and save our country’s lifelines.

We look forward to receiving your suggestions at Ideas@RallyForRivers.org

content courtesy : sadhguru.org

Climate change threat must be taken as seriously as nuclear war – UK minister

The threat of climate change needs to be assessed in the same comprehensive way as nuclear weapons proliferation, according to a UK foreign minister.

Baroness Joyce Anelay, minister of state at the Commonwealth and Foreign Office, said the indirect impacts of global warming, such as deteriorating international security, could be far greater than the direct effects, such as flooding. She issued the warning in a foreword to a new report on the risks of climate change led by the UK’s climate change envoy, Prof Sir David King.

The report, commissioned by the Foreign Office, and written by experts from the UK, US, China and India, is stark in its assessment of the wide-ranging dangers posed by unchecked global warming, including:

• very large risks to global food security, including a tripling of food prices
• unprecedented migration overwhelming international assistance
• increased risk of terrorism as states fail
• lethal heat even for people resting in shade

The world’s nations are preparing for a crunch UN summit in Paris in December, at which they must agree a deal to combat climate change.

Monday’s report states that existing plans to curb carbon emissions would heighten the chances of the climate passing tipping points “beyond which the inconvenient may become intolerable”. In 2004, King, then the government’s chief scientific adviser, warned that climate change is a more serious threat to the world than terrorism.

“Assessing the risk around [nuclear weapon proliferation] depends on understanding inter-dependent elements, including: what the science tells us is possible; what our political analysis tells us a country may intend; and what the systemic factors are, such as regional power dynamics,” said Anelay. “The risk of climate change demands a similarly holistic assessment.”

The report sets out the direct risks of climate change. “Humans have limited tolerance for heat stress,” it states. “In the current climate, safe climatic conditions for work are already exceeded frequently for short periods in hot countries, and heatwaves already cause fatalities. In future, climatic conditions could exceed potentially lethal limits of heat stress even for individuals resting in the shade.”

It notes that “the number of people exposed to extreme water shortage is projected to double, globally, by mid century due to population growth alone. Climate change could increase the risk in some regions.”

In the worst case, what is today a once-in-30-year flood could happen every three years in the highly populated river basins of the Yellow, Ganges and Indus rivers, the report said. Without dramatic cuts to carbon emissions, extreme drought affecting farmland could double around the world, with impacts in southern Africa, the US and south Asia.

Areas affected by the knock-on or systemic risks of global warming include global security with extreme droughts and competition for farmland causing conflicts. “Migration from some regions may become more a necessity than a choice, and could take place on a historically unprecedented scale,” the report says. “It seems likely that the capacity of the international community for humanitarian assistance would be overwhelmed.”

“The risks of state failure could rise significantly, affecting many countries simultaneously, and even threatening those that are currently considered developed and stable,” says the report. “The expansion of ungoverned territories would in turn increase the risks of terrorism.”

The report also assesses the systemic risk to global food supply, saying that rising extreme weather events could mean shocks to global food prices previously expected once a century could come every 30 years. “A plausible worst-case scenario could produce unprecedented price spikes on the global market, with a trebling of the prices of the worst-affected grains,” the report concludes.

The greatest risks are tipping points, the report finds, where the climate shifts rapidly into a new, dangerous phase state. But the report also states that political leadership, technology and investment patterns can also change abruptly too.

The report concludes: “The risks of climate change may be greater than is commonly realised, but so is our capacity to confront them. An honest assessment of risk is no reason for fatalism.”


content courtesy : theguardian 

How reusable bags change shopping decisions

Taking reusable bags to the supermarket can help identify the environmentally friendly shopper but a new study has now discovered the products they are more likely to buy.

New research in the Journal of Marketing reveals unsurprisingly that shoppers who take their own bags are more likely to purchase organic food – and more surprisingly, junk food as well.

The study describes: "Grocery store shoppers who bring their own bags are more likely to purchase healthy food. But those same shoppers often feel virtuous, because they are acting in an environmentally responsible way.

“That feeling easily persuades them that, because they are being good to the environment, they should treat themselves to cookies or potato chips or some other product with lots of fat, salt, or sugar."

The study by Uma R. Karmarkar of Harvard University and Bryan Bollinger of Duke University is one of the first to demonstrate that bringing reusable grocery bags causes significant changes in food purchasing behaviour.

The authors collected loyalty cardholder data from a single location of a major grocery chain in California between May 2005 and March 2007. They compared the same shoppers on trips for which they brought their own bags with trips for which they did not.

Participants were also recruited online from a national pool and were randomly assigned one of two situations: bringing their own bags or not bringing their own bags. Depending on the situation, participants were presented with a certain scenario and a floorplan of the grocery store and were asked to list the ten items they were most likely to purchase on the trip.

The researchers found that when shoppers brought their own bags, they were more likely to purchase organic foods. At the same time, bringing one's own bags also increased the likelihood that the shopper would purchase junk food. And both results were slightly less likely when the shopper had young children: parents have to balance their own purchasing preferences with competing motivations arising from their role as parents.

Content Courtecy :enn

If someone were to set up a telephone booth sized box on your street filled with unwanted items — such as books, toys and small knick knacks, perhaps — and then topped it off with a “Free” sign, what do you think would happen?

If Switzerland is any indication, passersby turned salvagers and recyclers would appear out of nowhere, sifting their way through other people’s unwanted discards, thinking up ways to put their newfound discoveries to good (re)use. Some would even add their own unwanted items to the box.

Neighborhood exchange boxes have helped Geneva, Switzerland reuse 32 tons of goods thus far thanks to a program called BOÎTES D’ÉCHANGE ENTRE VOISINS–A box for exchange between neighbors. But can it work in other cities?

Started in 2011, people leave items that they do not want, and take items that they do want. It’s that simple.

Or is it?

The environmental benefits of increasing reuse are obvious, but from the project creator’s perspective, there’s more to the Neighbourhood Exchange Box program than just going green.

It’s also part urban art and part social experiment, providers of unusual opportunities to create social and cultural links between people in a neighborhood.

The program page explains:

Neighbourhood Exchange Box is a project which explores reciprocity between neighbours. It brings a new impulse into the neighbourhood and a sense of belonging and involvement to the local community by prompting opportunities of exchange and contact.

Behind it all is Happy City Lab, founded by Dan Acher, an “artivist” from Geneva focused on creating happy cities.

Most of us know by now that reducing and reusing are part of the answer to what our planet needs more of, so instead the program toils over questions like:

Nowadays, whilst most of our interactions depend on money, is it still possible to establish a completely disinterested form of exchange, without even knowing who the beneficiary is? Is it possible to extend such a project to the scale of a whole town? That of a region? A country? Further?


Content Courtecy :enn

Safeguarding Our Future Water & Energy Systems-INFOGRAPHIC

As the Energy Department pursues our important mission areas of climate change, energy security and environmental responsibility, we must take into account dynamic interactions among our energy system, the population, the economy, other infrastructure systems and natural resources. One crucial interaction is that between our present-day energy and water systems, reports the DOE.

The interdependencies between our water and energy systems are clear — and becoming more prominent. Water is used in all phases of energy production and electricity generation, and energy is required to extract, convey and deliver water, and to treat wastewaters prior to their return to the environment.

The Energy Department’s new report – The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities – examines this interaction, and lays out several technical and operational challenges at local, regional and national scales. The report notes that water scarcity, variability and uncertainty are becoming more prevalent, potentially leading to vulnerabilities within the U.S. energy system. Changes brought on by population growth, technological advances and policy developments are increasing the urgency for informed action.

When severe drought affected more than a third of the United States in 2012, limited water availability constrained the operation of some power plants and other energy production infrastructure. When Hurricane Sandy struck that same year, we saw firsthand the major problems that arise when vital water infrastructure and facilities lose power.

And the recent boom in domestic unconventional oil and gas development, brought on by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, has added complexity to the national dialogue about the relationship between energy and water resources.

What’s more, the effects of climate change only amplify the need to manage our interdependent water and energy systems more mindfully. As the release of the third U.S. National Climate Assessment made clear last month, climate change is affecting every region of the United States and key sectors across our economy.

Even as the Energy Department is taking strong steps to cut carbon pollution and work with our international partners to build a more sustainable energy future, we must prepare for the effects of climate change we are already seeing.

The Energy Department’s longstanding leadership in modeling and technology research and development makes it uniquely suited to meet the national need for data-driven and empirical solutions to address these challenges. This report is just the beginning.

The Department of Energy looks forward to working with our partners, including other federal agencies, state and local governments, members of Congress, foreign governments, private industry, academic institutions, non-governmental organizations, and citizens, to develop and pursue a shared vision of more resilient coupled energy-water systems.

This integration and collaboration will enable more effective research, development and deployment of key technologies, harmonization of policies where warranted, shared datasets, informed decision-making, and robust public dialogue.

A key part of that dialogue is our ongoing meetings to gather public comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), a four-year process to identify key threats, risks and opportunities for U.S. energy and climate security.

 Last week in San Francisco, Dr. John Holdren — Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy — led a discussion with regional stakeholders about the water-energy nexus and lessons learned that could be applied broadly across this issue area. Future opportunities to provide input to the QER process remain.

Content Courtesy: energy.gov

Small Plastics Pose Big Problem

A decade or so ago, scientists first discovered that tiny pieces of plastic debris discarded by human civilization — some only a few thousandths of a millimeter in size — were finding their way into the oceans. But since then, it’s become increasingly apparent that microplastics, as the miniscule trash is called, represent a potentially huge threat to aquatic animals, according to an article in the July 11 edition of the journal Science.

The article, by marine scientists Kara Lavender Law of the Sea Education Association in Woods Hole, Mass. and Richard C. Thompson of the UK’s Plymouth University, notes that researchers increasingly are focusing upon the danger from microplastics, because their size makes it possible for a huge range of organisms — from large marine mammals, fish and birds to zooplankton — to ingest them. (Indeed, a 2012 study found that they pose a health threat to Baleen whales.)

Photos: Life on the Ocean Floor Garbage Patch

A report issued in June by the Global Ocean Commission estimated that 10 million tons of plastic is dumped into the oceans each year. Some of the plastic is discarded into waterways and then is carried into the ocean, but it’s also lost or discarded at sea by ships, the article notes.

Larger plastic items degrade to form microplastic, but some of the particles also are being put directly into the sea, because bits of cosmetic beads and clothing fibers are small enough to pass through wastewater treatment systems.

Once in the oceans, the particles are transported far and wide in a complex pattern that is difficult to predict. However, scientists have found very high concentrations in the subtropical gyres -- that is, areas where currents rotate rapidly — and in basins such as the Mediterranean.

Microplastics are themselves toxic, but they also soak up harmful chemicals that contaminate the ocean, such as DDT and PBDEs, so that they deliver a concentrated dose to the animals who ingest them. Marine scientists also worry that microplastics will end up in seafood-eating humans as well.

Video: How Much Trash is in the Ocean?

Microplastics are just one of the environmental woes afflicting the world’s oceans, and pushing them perilously close to ecological collapse, according to an article published last week in Foreign Policy, a political science journal.

Solving the problem is difficult because 65 percent of the oceans are outside the territorial waters of individual nations, and have become the equivalent of a chaotic, lawless “failed state” such as Somalia on land, the Foreign Policy article argued.

Content Courtesy: Discovery