India's Forests: Priceless Treasures Fighting for Survival

India's forests are among the most biologically rich and culturally significant ecosystems on the planet. They are home to the Royal Bengal Tiger, the Asian Elephant, the Indian One-Horned Rhinoceros, the Snow Leopard, the Clouded Leopard, the Wild Water Buffalo, the Indian Gaur, and thousands of other species of mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians found nowhere else on Earth. They shelter an estimated 47,000 species of plants, 16,000 species of flowering plants, and over 89,000 species of animals. India's forests are a living library of evolution that took millions of years to write. 

India has the tenth-largest forest area in the world, covering approximately 21.7% of its geographical area according to the Forest Survey of India. This falls short of the national policy target of 33% but represents significant forest wealth nonetheless. In recent years, India has reported modest net increases in forest and tree cover — a trend worth acknowledging, even as questions remain about the methodology used to measure it and the quality of the new forest cover. 

The quality distinction is crucial. India's forests are not all equal. The biodiversity-rich, old-growth tropical evergreen forests of the Western Ghats, the North-East, and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands — irreplaceable in terms of the species they shelter and the ecosystem services they provide — are fundamentally different from the monoculture commercial timber plantations or the degraded scrubland that often replaces them after clearance. Much of the 'increase' in forest cover measured in official surveys represents plantation cover rather than natural forest recovery. 

The Western Ghats and the North-Eastern states together constitute two of the world's 36 biodiversity hotspots — regions of extraordinary species richness and endemism. The Western Ghats are home to over 5,000 species of flowering plants, 139 species of mammals, 508 species of birds, and 179 species of amphibians — many of them found nowhere else on Earth. This mountain range stretching from Gujarat to Kerala is also the source of several of India's most important rivers, including the Godavari, Krishna, Kaveri, and Periyar. The forests that cloak these mountains are not merely beautiful — they are the water towers of peninsular India. 

The threats to India's forests are multiple and intensifying. Mining — for coal, iron ore, bauxite, and other minerals — is one of the most destructive. Some of the most biodiverse forests in India, particularly in Jharkhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh, sit atop coal deposits. The battle between conservation and development is fought most fiercely in these forest-covered mineral zones. Infrastructure development — highways, railways, hydroelectric dams, and transmission lines — fragments forest habitat, creating barriers to the movement of wide-ranging species like tigers and elephants. Agricultural encroachment, illegal logging, and forest fires further reduce and degrade India's forest estate. 

Climate change adds another layer of threat. As temperatures rise and rainfalThe Forest Rightsl patterns shift, many forest species will find their habitat becoming unsuitable. Species will need to move — uphill to cooler elevations, or toward the poles — to track their climate niches. But forests fragmented by agriculture and development create barriers to this movement, trapping species that may have survived climate change in an intact, connected landscape. 

The Forest Rights Act of 2006 was a landmark piece of legislation that recognized the rights of adivasi and forest-dwelling communities who had been managing forests sustainably for centuries, often without legal recognition of their relationship with the land. When communities have secure rights over their forests, they have both the incentive and the authority to protect them. Community forest management in India and around the world consistently outperforms state forest management in biodiversity conservation. 

Protecting India's forests is not just an environmental imperative — it is an economic, social, and cultural one. The forests provide livelihoods for over 200 million people who depend on them for food, medicine, fuel, water, and cultural identity. They protect the water security of hundreds of millions more. They are the physical and spiritual foundation of Indian civilization. They deserve not just protection but the deep reverence that India's own traditions have always accorded them.

Content Courtesy: Inspired by Forest Survey of India (FSI) State of Forest Report

Trees: Nature's Air Conditioners, Water Managers, and Climate Heroes

 

A single mature tree can absorb up to 22 kilograms of carbon dioxide every year, release enough oxygen to support two human beings, intercept thousands of litres of rainfall, provide a home for dozens of species of birds, insects, and other creatures, lower the surrounding air temperature by several degrees through evapotranspiration, and reduce stress and improve mental health in the people who walk or sit beneath it. All of this, for free, powered by nothing but sunlight and water. Trees may be the single most extraordinary living things on Earth. 

Yet we are destroying them at a rate that future generations will struggle to comprehend. Global deforestation claims approximately 15 billion trees every year — that is nearly 2 million trees every hour. The world has lost approximately 46% of its tree cover since the dawn of human civilization. In India, urban tree cover is declining rapidly as cities expand, construction booms, and road widening projects claim century-old trees. In rural areas, agricultural expansion, fuelwood collection, and infrastructure development are shrinking forests and tree cover continuously. 

The consequences are far-reaching and deeply interconnected. Trees are the primary mechanism by which terrestrial ecosystems cycle water. When a tree absorbs water through its roots and releases it as vapour through its leaves, it contributes to local rainfall patterns and moisture availability. Large forests like the Amazon and the Himalayan foothills essentially generate their own weather — removing them disrupts rainfall patterns across entire continents. The declining forests of the Western Ghats are already affecting the monsoon patterns of peninsular India. 

Trees are also the lungs of cities. Urban trees absorb pollutants like nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter, making city air measurably cleaner and healthier. Studies have shown that urban areas with high tree cover have lower rates of respiratory disease, lower hospital admission rates during heat waves, and lower rates of stress and anxiety among residents. Trees are not an aesthetic luxury in cities — they are critical public health infrastructure. 

The importance of trees in regulating temperature cannot be overstated. A shaded area under a mature tree can be 5–10°C cooler than an adjacent unshaded area on a hot summer day. In Indian cities, where summer temperatures regularly exceed 40°C, this is not a trivial difference — it can be the difference between life and death for the elderly, the very young, and outdoor workers. As climate change intensifies heat waves, urban trees will become increasingly vital. 

India's relationship with trees is ancient and profound. The Bodhi tree under which the Buddha attained enlightenment, the banyan tree sacred to Vishnu, the neem tree whose medicinal properties have been recognized for millennia, the peepal tree at the heart of every village — trees are woven into the spiritual and cultural fabric of Indian life. India also pioneered some of the world's most powerful tree protection movements, including the Chipko movement of the 1970s and the ongoing battles against destructive highway projects. 

The Miyawaki method of intensive native forest planting is gaining exciting momentum in Indian cities. By planting dozens of native tree species together in a small area, Miyawaki forests grow ten times faster than conventional plantations, become self-sustaining within two to three years, and provide far richer biodiversity than monoculture plantings. Urban Miyawaki forests have been successfully created in Hyderabad, Mumbai, Pune, and dozens of other cities. 

This monsoon season — and every monsoon season — let us commit not just to planting trees, but to caring for them. Planting is easy; nurturing a sapling to a mature tree takes years of watering, protection, and patience. Let us also commit to protecting the trees that already stand — especially the old, large trees that took decades to grow and provide irreplaceable benefits. Every tree that stands is a gift to the generations that come after us. Let us give generously.

Content Courtesy: Original content for Green World

India's forest cover is on the up – but are the numbers too good to be true?

Forest cover in India increased by 5871 sq km (2266 sq miles) between 2010 and 2012.

That’s the cheery headline news from the State of the Forest Report 2013 released this month by India’s environment minister, Prakash Javadekar. The findings appear to mark a turnaround from the previous survey, which had found a marginal decline in forests.

But the fine print reveals a less rosy picture. The bulk of the increase in forest cover – about 3800 sq km – was in just one state, the report shows, and is partly attributed to a correction in previous survey data.

In fact, India may be losing quality forests. Dense forests are degrading into scrub or sparsely covered forest areas in many states, says the report. “Moderately dense” forest cover – areas with a tree canopy density of between 40-70% – shrank by 1991 sq km in the two-year period, while “open forests” with less than 40% canopy increased by 7831 sq km.

Another potential worry: the Himalayan northeastern region, which holds one-fourth of the country’s forests, has seen a small decline of 627 sq km in forest cover.

India’s total forest cover now stands at 697,898 sq km or 21.23% of the country’s area. That’s well short of the official goal to get cover up to 30% of land area (in February, the government approved a £4.46m project to increase forest area).

Yet there’s been an overall rising trend in the recorded forest cover over the past decade – no mean feat given the dramatic acceleration in economic development in the same period.

This upward trend seems far-fetched to many conservationists, however. One environmental watchdog group, the Environment Impact and Assessment Resource and Response Centre, noted that an average of 135 hectares (333 acres) of forest land a day was given over for power, mining and other development projects last year. The group expressed dismay at the environment minister’s suggestion that degraded or open forests should be harvested to reduce wood imports.

Both conservationists and scientists have long questioned the Indian forest survey’s accuracy and methods. They’ve argued that the survey relies too heavily on low-resolution satellite imagery, which fails to capture small-scale deforestation, and that the definition of forest used by the report is too broad to be meaningful.

The forest cover data does not, for instance, distinguish between tree species, land use or ownership. A paper published in May by scientists led by NH Ravindranath of the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore suggested that an almost seven-million-hectare recorded increase in forest cover between 1997 and 2011 could be accounted for by an increase in commercial plantations.

India could be potentially over-reporting the forest cover by including many plantation categories and fruit orchards…. Even the inclusion of plantations of Eucalyptus, Casuarina, Poplar, etc. under forest cover is questionable from a conservation perspective. India also could be potentially under-reporting deforestation by reporting only the gross forest area and changes at the national and state level, which may mask any forest loss, if the rate of afforestation is higher than deforestation rates.

With India seeking to tap international climate funds for afforestation, “there is need for a new approach to monitoring and reporting of forest area to meet the challenges of forest conservation, research and reporting to UN agencies,” the authors said.

Forest officials too have criticised the survey methods. In 2012, a joint director at the Forest Survey of India, which prepares the report, took on his own organisation when he flagged the discrepancy between the official forest data for the northeastern state of Meghalaya, which showed an increase in cover, and what he saw happening on the ground: forests being destroyed by illegal mills and mining.

Mining in this green, resource-rich region continues to be a concern. A recent report by India’s Comptroller and Auditor General found only one of 16 limestone mining licenses in the state of Meghalaya had obtained environmental clearances. “[T]he forest department has no idea as to whether the mining lease areas it granted forest clearance fall within forest area,” the report said.

Content Courtersy: theguardian